At AuDeo, we haven't heard all the questions and certainly don't have all the answers. This business technology is however, bringing benefits to business efficiencies - whilst more importantly, at the same time it is reducing the hassle and stress of business travel. Perhaps some things have no good answers yet, at AuDeo our goal is to dispel myths and explore with our clients just how to best utilise this technology. If you have a question, we would like to have a go at answering it with you.
Video conferencing is a live connection between people in separate locations for the purpose of communication, usually involving audio and often text as well as video. Videoconferencing in its simplest form transmits static images and text between two locations. Sophisticated video systems today can transmit full-motion video images and high-quality audio between multiple locations.
|
Each site participating in the videoconference will require, as a minimum, a camera, a codec, a microphone, a speaker and a monitor. The camera and microphone capture the image and sound, the codec converts the video and audio into a digital signal, encodes it and sends it out. The codec at the other end decodes the signal and distributes the video and audio to the monitor and speaker.
|
A video conferencing system can cost anything from £2,000 at entry level to £20,000 for an integrated system. Expensive compared to what? A photocopier? A few international flights? A Car? It is better to ask whether it is cost effective.
|
Absolutely, a waste of money! This is a common experience but so are the hours of queuing, driving, flying, waiting on platforms, in lounges, reception areas. Just because the idea wasn't implemented properly, it does not have to follow that it is a bad idea. It is better to ask is modern video equipment more useable and can staff be trained successfully.
|
This is like saying "I don't go to the cinema - I've seen one in my friend's house" because professional Videoconferencing equipment is just about as far away from web-conferencing as the Odeon is from the a 42 inch flat T.V. With the evolution of High Definition technology, video conferencing today is approaching the same value as face-to-face meetings.
|
This is not surprising and is probably the biggest use-ability issue. With a little planning, a little training, and some expert help - video calls do now get through about 19 times out of every 20.
Better comments - "I get through on video better than I do by fax or mobile phones, or more often than I get a clear run on the M25, or I don't have a train/flight delay".
|
The majority of opinion about video conferencing is based on old experience. Video conferencing technology has improved considerably over the last few years. Acceptance is also hampered by confusion between proper video tools and hobbyist toys on the Internet; the quality and user experience between these is vast.
|
Of course! - Videoconference facilities only add an alternative way of getting in front of your colleagues and associates - we use the telephone, and video increases the richness massively. Maybe we can get by on video for 3 meetings out of 4 - the face-to-face then becomes more meaningful - it can become a treat instead of a bind!
|